The size of the European electrosurgical devices market is expected to be worth USD 2.23 billion by 2027 and USD 1.68 billion in 2022, growing at a CAGR of 5.77% during the forecast period.
The increase in chronic diseases, the aging population, and surgical operations are factors contributing to the market's rise. The increase in Europe's geriatric population has led to increased demand for operations, particularly minimally invasive surgeries. Furthermore, plastic and reconstructive surgeries, which are usually done for aesthetic or cosmetic reasons, expand the number of medical, cosmetic, and age-related surgeries performed, and the growing number of ambulatory surgery facilities has grown in popularity. The improvements in electrosurgical equipment, such as the decrease of collateral damage to tissues, the creation of eschar, and the restriction of tissue attachment, have all contributed to the growing popularity of electrosurgical devices.
R&D in this sector for technological advancements in electrosurgery equipment and an increase in the number of operations and surgical treatments are expected to open up opportunities in the near future. Electrosurgical devices have been widely utilized in the fields of gynecology, cosmetology, open surgery, laparoscopic operations, and flexible endoscopic techniques for minimally invasive surgeries. Shorter hospital stays, smaller incisions, fewer post-surgical problems, and faster recovery are all advantages of minimally invasive surgery. These benefits entice patients and help to increase the number of people who choose minimally invasive surgery. Players in the electrosurgical devices market may expect attractive growth opportunities as the usage of less invasive methods in cosmetology operations grows. Traditional open surgery has given way to the use of less intrusive methods.
The European electrosurgical devices industry is hampered by problems such as strict government regulations. During the analysis period, stringent EU reform requirements for electrosurgical equipment would restrict the market growth. However, because these devices are advanced, they require experts who have been educated to use them. The high expense of training has resulted in a scarcity of skilled workers. As a result, this issue is restricting the market's expansion. Furthermore, the European electrosurgical devices market is likely to be hampered by stringent regulatory requirements for device approvals and product recalls.
Product delays and increased expenses resulting from strict regulatory processes impose a burden on expenditures in electrosurgical equipment and new product development, potentially resulting in revenue loss.
This research report on the Europe Electrosurgical Devices Market has been segmented and sub-segmented into the following categories:
By Product:
By Type:
By Country:
Geographically, Germany held the highest proportion of the European electrosurgical instruments market. The market's growth is primarily driven by investment in the healthcare sector. The European Union's health industry relies heavily on public and private funding, accounting for almost 10 percent of GDP. Therefore, the market's growth is heavily influenced by improvements in healthcare infrastructure. Electrosurgical devices are widely used by surgeons across regional markets because they are reasonably efficient, because of little blood loss, and considerably shorten recovery time, fueling market revenue over the forecast period. The introduction of monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical units (ESUs) has expanded the range of devices that can be used. Furthermore, the rising number of operations in a variety of healthcare fields has fueled the market growth.
KEY MARKET PLAYERS:
Some of the prominent companies dominating the Europe Electrosurgical Devices Market profiled in the report are Ethicon, Inc. (U.S.) (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (U.S.)), Olympus Corporation (Japan), Covidien plc., and Medtronic (Ireland).
1.Introduction
1.1 Market Definition
1.2 Study Deliverables
1.3 Base Currency, Base Year and Forecast Periods
1.4 General Study Assumptions
2. Research Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Research Phases
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Econometric Modelling
2.2.4 Expert Validation
2.3 Analysis Design
2.4 Study Timeline
3. Overview
3.1 Executive Summary
3.2 Key Inferences
3.3 Epidemology
4. Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Challenges Analysis (DROC)
4.1 Market Drivers
4.2 Market Restraints
4.3 Key Challenges
4.4 Current Opportunities in the Market
5. Market Segmentation
5.1 Product
5.1.1 Introduction
5.1.2 Electrosurgical Generators
5.1.3 Electrosurgical Instruments and Accessories
5.1.3.1 Electrosurgical Instruments
5.1.3.1.1 Bipolar Electrosurgical Instruments
5.1.3.1.1.1 Advanced Vessel Sealing Instruments
5.3.1.1.2 Bipolar Forceps
5.1.3.1.2 Monopolar Electrosurgical Instruments
5.1.3.1.2.1 Electrosurgical Pencils
5.1.3.1.2.2 Electrosurgical Electrodes
5.1.3.1.2.3 Suction Coagulators
5.1.3.1.2.4 Monopolar Forceps
5.1.3.2 Electrosurgical Accessories
5.1.3.1.1 Patient Return Electrodes
5.1.3.1.2 Cords, Cables, and Adapters
5.1.3.1.3 Others
5.1.4 Argon and Smoke Management Systems
5.1.5 Y-o-Y Growth Analysis, By Product
5.1.6 Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Product
5.1.7 Market Share Analysis, By Product
5.2 Type
5.2.1 Introduction
5.2.1.1 General Surgery
5.2.1.2 Gynecological Surgery
5.2.1.3 Urologic Surgery
5.2.1.4 Orthopedic Surgery
5.2.1.5 Cardiovascular Surgery
5.2.1.6 Cosmetic Surgery
5.2.1.7 Neurosurgery
5.2.1.8 Other Surgeries
5.2.5 Y-o-Y Growth Analysis, By Type
5.2.6 Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Type
5.2.7 Market Share Analysis, By Type
6. Geographical Analysis
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 Regional Trends
6.1.2 Impact Analysis
6.1.3 Y-o-Y Growth Analysis
6.1.3.1 By Geographical Area
6.1.3.2 By Product
6.1.3.3 By Type
6.1.4 Market Attractiveness Analysis
6.1.4.1 By Geographical Area
6.1.4.2 By Product
6.1.4.3 By Type
6.1.5 Market Share Analysis
6.1.5.1 By Geographical Area
6.1.5.2 By Product
6.1.5.3 By Type
6.2 U.K
6.3 Spain
6.4 Germany
6.5 Italy
6.6 France
7.Strategic Analysis
7.1 PESTLE analysis
7.1.1 Political
7.1.2 Economic
7.1.3 Social
7.1.4 Technological
7.1.5 Legal
7.1.6 Environmental
7.2 Porter’s Five analysis
7.2.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
7.2.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
7.2.3 Threat of New Entrants
7.2.4 Threat of Substitute Products and Services
7.2.5 Competitive Rivalry within the Industry
8.Market Leaders' Analysis
8.1 Medtronic PLC
8.1.1 Overview
8.1.2 Product Analysis
8.1.3 Financial analysis
8.1.4 Recent Developments
8.1.5 SWOT analysis
8.1.6 Analyst View
8.2 Conmed Corporation
8.3 B. Braun Melsungen AG
8.4 Johnson & Johnson
8.5 Olympus Corporation
8.6 Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
8.7 Celgene Corporation
8.8 Megadyne Medical Products, Inc
8.9 Bovie Medical Corporation
8.10 Bowa-Electronic GmbH & Co. Kg
9.Competitive Landscape
9.1 Market share analysis
9.2 Merger and Acquisition Analysis
9.3 Agreements, collaborations and Joint Ventures
9.4 New Product Launches
10.Market Outlook and Investment Opportunities
Appendix
a) List of Tables
b) List of Figures
Related Reports
Talk to our analyst and get customised report done according to your research needs
Check if you can avail any discount. Submit your details and our team will get back to you.
Request to avail a free sample report that reflects this market and its growth.
