As per our report, the trauma fixation devices market in the Asia Pacific is predicted to worth USD 1.38 Billion by 2024 from USD 0.94 Billion in 2019, growing at a CAGR of 7.91%.
Trauma is a condition caused by various strains or physical injuries, such as dislocation, fractures, or burns due to external sources. Currently, to treat trauma various treatments are available based on the severity of the injury. Trauma fixation devices are one of the key treatment methods for the aforementioned medical conditions.
With the rising geriatric population, the demand for trauma fixation devices is expected to increase as the aged people are more prone to osteoporosis, which employs trauma fixation devices for treatment. Further, the increase in disposable incomes of people, favorable government policies, and advancements in medical facilities increase in healthcare expenditure, high cost, and complications associated with surgeries and hospital bedtime are contributing to the growth of Asia-Pacific trauma fixation devices market.
However, compatibility issues associated with the usage of internal trauma devices and the high cost of advanced technologies are inhibiting the reach of the trauma fixation devices in this region.
This research report segmented and sub-segmented into the following categories:
The rise in geriatric population and personal disposable income of people in Asian countries such as China and India are contributing to the market growth in these emerging nations.
The Asia-Pacific trauma fixation devices market is a competitive market with a number of market players which is dominated by new product launches, mergers & acquisitions.
Market leaders in the APAC Trauma Fixation Devices Market profiled in this report are Smith & Nephew, DePuy Synthesis, Stryker Corporation, Zimmer, Arthrex, Biomet, Conmed, Integra Lifesciences Corporation, Medtronic, Inc. and Bioretec, Inc.
1. Introduction
1.1 Market Definition
1.2 Study Deliverables
1.3 Base Currency, Base Year and Forecast Periods
1.4 General Study Assumptions
2. Research Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Research Phases
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Econometric Modelling
2.2.4 Expert Validation
2.3 Analysis Design
2.4 Study Timeline
3. Overview
3.1 Executive Summary
3.2 Key Inferences
3.3 New Developments
4. Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Challenges Analysis (DROC)
4.1 Market Drivers
4.2 Market Restraints
4.3 Key Challenges
4.4 Current Opportunities in the Market
5. Market Segmentation
5.1 By Type
5.1.1 Internal trauma fixation devices
5.1.1.1 Screws
5.1.1.2 Rods
5.1.1.3 Plates
5.1.1.4 Wires
5.1.1.5 Intramedullary nails
5.1.2 External Trauma fixation devices
5.1.2.1 Unilateral fixation
5.1.2.2 Circular fixation
5.1.2.3 Hybrid fixation
5.2 By End Users
5.2.1 Hospitals
5.2.2 Point of Care testing
5.2.3 Others
6. Geographical Analysis
6.3 Asia-Pacific
6.1 Introduction
6.2 China
6.3 India
6.4 Japan
6.5 South Korea
6.6 Australia
7. Strategic Analysis
7.1 PESTLE analysis
7.1.1 Political
7.1.2 Economic
7.1.3 Social
7.1.4 Technological
7.1.5 Legal
7.1.6 Environmental
7.2 Porter’s Five analysis
7.2.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
7.2.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
7.2.3 Threat of New Entrants
7.2.4 Threat of Substitute Products and Services
7.2.5 Competitive Rivalry within the Industry
8. Market Leaders' Analysis
8.1 Arthrex
8.1.1 Overview
8.1.2 Product Analysis
8.1.3 Strategic Evaluation and Operations
8.1.4 Financial analysis
8.1.5 Legal issues
8.1.6 Recent Developments
8.1.7 SWOT analysis
8.1.8 Analyst View
8.2 Biomet
8.3 Conmed
8.4 DePuy Synthesis
8.5 Smith & Nephew
8.6 Stryker Corporation
8.7 Integra Lifesciences Corporation
8.8 Zimmer
8.9 Bioretec, Inc.
8.10 Medtronic, Inc.
9. Competitive Landscape
9.1 Market share analysis
9.2 Merger and Acquisition Analysis
9.3 Agreements, collaborations and Joint Ventures
9.4 New Product Launches
10. Expert Opinions
10.1 Market Outlook
10.2 Investment Opportunities
Appendix
a) List of Tables
b) List of Figures
Related Reports
